United States v. Howard

352 F. App'x 827
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Howard. Read the opinion of the Court — 309 F. App'x 760
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 23, 2009·No. No. 09-6987·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Melvin E. Howard appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We find no reversible error and we thus affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Howard, No. 5:95-cr-00123-BO-10 (E.D.N.C. May 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Howard, 352 F. App'x 827 (4th Cir. 2009).

352 F. App'x 827 (United States v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related