United States v. Houston

325 F. App'x 902
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 26, 2009·No. No. 08-17234·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Kenneth Dwayne Houston in this appeal from the district court’s denial of Houston’s motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to -withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of relief under § 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Houston, 325 F. App'x 902 (11th Cir. 2009).

325 F. App'x 902 (United States v. Houston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)