United States v. Houser

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Houser

531 F. App'x 339

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 28, 2013·No. No. 13-6242·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rufus Houser appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States [340] v. Houser, No. 3:95-cr00012-JPB-3, 2013 WL 310291 (ND.W.Va. Jan. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rufus Houser appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States [340] v. Houser, No. 3:95-cr00012-JPB-3, 2013 WL 310291 (ND.W.Va. Jan. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Houser, 531 F. App'x 339 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

531 F. App'x 339 (United States v. Houser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related