United States v. Horvath

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 25, 2009
• Docket: 08-8166
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8166

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RITCHIE JOHN HORVATH, III,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:05-cr-00008-FFF-6)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 25, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ritchie John Horvath, III, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ritchie John Horvath, III, appeals the district

court’s orders denying his motion for modification of sentence

under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying reconsideration.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Horvath, No. 4:05-cr-00008-FFF-6

(W.D. Va. Sept. 2, 2008; Sept. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED