United States v. Horsley

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 5, 2010·No. 09-8151·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8151

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

TRALANE LEE HORSLEY,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cr-00546-JCC-1)

Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 5, 2010

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tralane Lee Horsley, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Michael Fitzpatrick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tralane Lee Horsley appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of

sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Horsley, No. 1:05-cr-00546-

JCC-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Horsley, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Horsley (United States v. Horsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related