United States v. Holt

650 F.2d 651, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11496
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 13, 1981
Docket78-5260
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 650 F.2d 651 (United States v. Holt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Holt, 650 F.2d 651, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11496 (5th Cir. 1981).

Opinion

650 F.2d 651

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
John Alan HOLT, Rosario Palermo, William H. Brown, a/k/a
Bill, John D. Fisher, Robert D. Young, Joseph Macaluso,
a/k/a Joe, Frank Scionti, John Nicholas Lostracco, Sam C.
Martino, Paul Guarino, Jimmy Farina, Berton B. Chase, a/k/a
Bert, Rolando Gonsalez Rodriguez, a/k/a Roland Rodriguez,
Joseph D. Lazzara, a/k/a Joe, Joseph C. Russello, a/k/a Joe,
and Amalia Morgado, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 78-5260.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

July 13, 1981.

Gary L. Betz, U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., Eleanor J. Hill, Sp. Atty., Dept. of Justice, Crim. Div., Tampa, Fla., Sara Criscitelli, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellee.

William B. Plowman, Tampa, Fla., for Farina.

Mark J. Kadish, Edward T. M. Garland, Atlanta, Ga. (Court-appointed), for Brown.

Peter N. Macaluso, Tampa, Fla., for Rodriguez.

Barry A. Cohen, Richard G. Pippinger, Tampa, Fla., for Lazzara.

Raymond E. LaPorte, Tampa, Fla., for Rusello.

Michael Addison, Tampa, Fla. (Court-appointed), for Morgado.

Before TUTTLE, VANCE and POLITZ, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

It has been made known to the Court as a fact, supported by the official death certificate of the state of Florida, that JOHN ALAN HOLT, one of the co-appellants herein, died in Tampa, Florida on April 23, 1981. The decision of this Court as to JOHN ALAN HOLT, 648 F.2d 367, is reconsidered and his appeal is dismissed as moot, and his cause is remanded with directions to the district court to vacate the judgment and dismiss the indictment as against him. United States v. Pauline, 625 F.2d 684 (5th Cir. 1980).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Palfrey
515 F. Supp. 2d 120 (District of Columbia, 2007)
State v. Bates
933 P.2d 48 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1997)
United States v. Gross
766 F. Supp. 302 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1991)
Beck v. Edward D. Jones & Co.
735 F. Supp. 903 (C.D. Illinois, 1990)
Nixon v. United States
703 F. Supp. 538 (S.D. Mississippi, 1988)
Marriott Bros. v. Gage
704 F. Supp. 731 (N.D. Texas, 1988)
United States v. Cline
655 F. Supp. 796 (M.D. Louisiana, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
650 F.2d 651, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-holt-ca5-1981.