United States v. Hollowell

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Hollowell

487 F. App'x 97

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 6, 2012·No. No. 12-7403·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Junior Hollowell, Sr. appeals the district court’s order construing his successive 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction as a motion for reconsideration, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hollowell, No. 2:08-cr-00076-RBS-JEB-1 (E.D.Va. July 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Junior Hollowell, Sr. appeals the district court’s order construing his successive 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction as a motion for reconsideration, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hollowell, No. 2:08-cr-00076-RBS-JEB-1 (E.D.Va. July 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Hollowell, 487 F. App'x 97 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

487 F. App'x 97 (United States v. Hollowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related