United States v. Holland
This text of 396 F. App'x 937 (United States v. Holland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Bobby N. Holland, Bobby N. Holland as Trustee, Jacquelyn Holland, and Rebecca Holland appeal two district court orders. The first order granted summary to the Government and Option One Mortgage Corporation, reduced various tax liens to judgment, and ordered the sale of real property at 1805 Trinity Road in Raleigh, North Carolina. The second granted the Government’s motion to reconsider and amended the amount of the assessments as of September 15, 2008. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellants’ motion for abeyance and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Holland, 637 F.Supp.2d 315 (E.D.N.C.2009); (filed Aug. 13, 2009 & entered Aug. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
396 F. App'x 937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-holland-ca4-2010.