United States v. Holland

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6444

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DENNIS HOLLAND,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas David Schroeder, District Judge. (1:03-cr-00264-TDS-1)

Submitted: October 27, 2009 Decided: December 14, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis Holland, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dennis Holland appeals the district court’s order

denying Holland’s motion to compel the Government to file a

substantial assistance motion. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Holland,

No. 1:03-cr-00264-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 18, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED