United States v. Hirahara

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Hirahara

164 F.2d 157, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 1875

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 31, 1947

DocketNo. 11576

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 164 F.2d 157 (United States v. Hirahara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Hirahara, 164 F.2d 157, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 1875 (9th Cir. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on appeal from an order dismissing an action brought under § 205(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act, as, amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 925(e), to recover treble damages for violation of maximum price regulations on lumber.

The situation in this case is identical with that in Porter v. Koike, No. 11,575, 9 Cir., 164 F.2d 155. There, as here, the substitution of the United States as party plaintiff and a summary reversal are sought. For the reasons stated in our opinion in Porter v. Koike the motion for substitution of the United States as party plaintiff is granted and the order of dismissal, 69 F.Supp. 441, is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on appeal from an order dismissing an action brought under § 205(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act, as, amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 925(e), to recover treble damages for violation of maximum price regulations on lumber.

The situation in this case is identical with that in Porter v. Koike, No. 11,575, 9 Cir., 164 F.2d 155. There, as here, the substitution of the United States as party plaintiff and a summary reversal are sought. For the reasons stated in our opinion in Porter v. Koike the motion for substitution of the United States as party plaintiff is granted and the order of dismissal, 69 F.Supp. 441, is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 F.2d 157, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 1875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hirahara-ca9-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack