United States v. Hinds
This text of 229 F. App'x 901 (United States v. Hinds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robin Farnsworth, counsel for Richard Hinds in this appeal from his resentencing, which was mandated in United States v. Hinds, 164 Fed.Appx. 934 (11th Cir.2006) (unpublished opinion), when we affirmed his conviction, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because we previously affirmed Hinds’s conviction, and because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hinds’s sentence imposed by the district court on May 12, 2006, is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
229 F. App'x 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hinds-ca11-2007.