United States v. Hinds

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Hinds

164 F. App'x 934

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJanuary 31, 2006

DocketNo. 05-11166; D.C. Docket No. 04-60072-CR-KAM

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 164 F. App'x 934 (United States v. Hinds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Hinds, 164 F. App'x 934 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this direct appeal, Hinds challenges only his sentence. In light of the Eleventh Circuit’s recent decision, United States v. Garcia, 405 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir.2005), which was handed down after the decision of the district court, we vacate and remand Hinds’ sentence for the purpose of determining Garcia’s relevance, if any, to the instant case. We express no opinion on the merits of the issues in the case.

The judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED, but the sentence is VACATED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In this direct appeal, Hinds challenges only his sentence. In light of the Eleventh Circuit’s recent decision, United States v. Garcia, 405 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir.2005), which was handed down after the decision of the district court, we vacate and remand Hinds’ sentence for the purpose of determining Garcia’s relevance, if any, to the instant case. We express no opinion on the merits of the issues in the case.

The judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED, but the sentence is VACATED and REMANDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 F. App'x 934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hinds-ca11-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack