United States v. Hinds

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Hinds

164 F. App'x 934

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 31, 2006·No. No. 05-11166; D.C. Docket No. 04-60072-CR-KAM·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this direct appeal, Hinds challenges only his sentence. In light of the Eleventh Circuit’s recent decision, United States v. Garcia, 405 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir.2005), which was handed down after the decision of the district court, we vacate and remand Hinds’ sentence for the purpose of determining Garcia’s relevance, if any, to the instant case. We express no opinion on the merits of the issues in the case.

The judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED, but the sentence is VACATED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In this direct appeal, Hinds challenges only his sentence. In light of the Eleventh Circuit’s recent decision, United States v. Garcia, 405 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir.2005), which was handed down after the decision of the district court, we vacate and remand Hinds’ sentence for the purpose of determining Garcia’s relevance, if any, to the instant case. We express no opinion on the merits of the issues in the case.

The judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED, but the sentence is VACATED and REMANDED.

United States v. Hinds, 164 F. App'x 934 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

164 F. App'x 934 (United States v. Hinds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related