United States v. HINCKLEY, JR.

District of Columbia

United States v. HINCKLEY, JR.

278 F. Supp. 2d 37, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14629, 2003 WL 22012592

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedAugust 22, 2003

DocketCR. 81-0306(PLF)

StatusPublished

This text of 278 F. Supp. 2d 37 (United States v. HINCKLEY, JR.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. HINCKLEY, JR., 278 F. Supp. 2d 37, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14629, 2003 WL 22012592 (D.D.C. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon the government’s memorandum on open hearings and motion to unseal the pleadings and orders in this case, and upon Mr. Hinckley’s motion to maintain the seal on the August 5, 2003 letter from Saint Elizabeths Hospital to the Court that is currently in the record and to file a redacted version. For the reasons stated in the government’s motion and in Mr. Hinckley’s motion, it is hereby

ORDERED that both the government’s motion and Mr. Hinckley’s motion are GRANTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing now scheduled in this matter on September 2, 2003 at 10:00 a.m. is converted to a status conference; it shall be held in open court; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the August 5, 2003 letter from Saint Elizabeths Hospital to the Court that is currently in the court record shall remain under seal and the redacted version, which was filed as Exhibit A to Mr. Hinckley’s motion to maintain the seal and to file a redacted version, will be publicly filed; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that all other pleadings and orders filed in this case since March 3, 2003 hereby are unsealed.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI