United States v. Hill

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hill. Read the opinion of the Court — 80 F.4th 595
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 1, 2026·No. 25-11121·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 25-11121 Document: 59-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/01/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 25-11121 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ June 1, 2026 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Amare Lavonn Hill,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:25-CR-11-1 ______________________________

Before Richman, Southwick, and Willett, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Amare Lavonn Hill has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hill has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-11121 Document: 59-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/01/2026

No. 25-11121

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hill, (5th Cir. 2026).

United States v. Hill (United States v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)