United States v. Hill
This text of United States v. Hill (United States v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 22-10548 Document: 00516604268 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/10/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 22-10548 FILED January 10, 2023 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Terrence Rashard Hill,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CR-136-1 ______________________________
Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Terrence Rashard Hill has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hill has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-10548 Document: 00516604268 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/10/2023
No. 22-10548
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Hill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hill-ca5-2023.