United States v. Hill
This text of United States v. Hill (United States v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7509
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROBERT HILL, a/k/a Benny,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:03-cr-00059-REP)
Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 22, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Elizabeth Chase, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Robert Hill appeals the district court’s order denying
his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of sentence.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Hill, No. 3:03-cr-00059-REP (E.D. Va.
July 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Hill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hill-ca4-2010.