United States v. Hill

21 F. App'x 18
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided October 25, 2001·No. 01-1336·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was argued on September 14, 2001, in conjunction with several other *19 appeals raising the same principal question: does an undifferentiated conviction under Maine’s general-purpose assault statute, Me.Rev.Stat. Ann. tit. 17-A, § 207, constitute a conviction for a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence within the purview of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9)? We answered that question affirmatively in United States v. Nason, 269 F.3d 10 (1st Cir.2001). Nason is fully dispositive here. Accordingly, the government’s appeal is sustained, the district court’s dismissal of the indictment is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the rule announced in Nason.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hill, 21 F. App'x 18 (1st Cir. 2001).

21 F. App'x 18 (United States v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Denis
297 F.3d 25 (First Circuit, 2002)