United States v. Hicks

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hicks. Read the opinion of the Court — 228 F. App'x 314
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 1, 2009·No. 09-6550·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6550

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIE LEE HICKS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:03-cr-00233-REP-1)

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: July 1, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Lee Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Willie Lee Hicks appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Hicks, No. 3:03-

cr-00233-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2009). We deny Hicks’ motion

for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hicks, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Hicks (United States v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related