United States v. Hickman

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hickman. Read the opinion of the Court — 626 F.3d 756
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 8, 2009·No. 09-6077·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6077

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STANLEY HICKMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:93-cr-00144-BO-3)

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 8, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Hickman, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Stanley Hickman appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Hickman, No. 5:93-cr-00144-BO-

3 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 17, 2008 & entered Dec. 23, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hickman, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Hickman (United States v. Hickman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related