United States v. Heyward

22 M.J. 689, 1986 CMR LEXIS 2547
CourtU S Air Force Court of Military Review
DecidedMay 8, 1986
DocketACM 24138
StatusPublished

This text of 22 M.J. 689 (United States v. Heyward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U S Air Force Court of Military Review primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Heyward, 22 M.J. 689, 1986 CMR LEXIS 2547 (usafctmilrev 1986).

Opinion

DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW

PER CURIAM:

On 23 February 1984, this Court affirmed the appellant’s general court-martial conviction of conspiracy to obstruct justice, dereliction of duty, two specifications of obstructions of justice, and three specifications of use of marihuana, in violation of Articles 81, 92, and 134, U.C.M.J., 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 892, 934, respectively. His sentence to a dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for seven years, forfeiture of $450.00 for month for three months, and reduction to the grade of sergeant was also affirmed by this Court. United States v. Heyward, 17 M.J. 942 (A.F.C.M.R.1984).

On 10 May 1984, appellant submitted a petition for a grant of review of our decision to the Court of Military Appeals which was granted by that Court on 20 August 1984. United States v. Heyward, 19 M.J. 29 (C.M.A.1984). That Court, in a decision dated 14 April 1986, reversed our decision as to Charge I and its specification, set aside the findings of guilty thereon, and dismissed them. That decision mandated a return of the record of trial in the case to The Judge Advocate General for submission to this Court for reassessment of the sentence based upon the remaining findings of guilty. United States v. Heyward, 22 M.J. 35 (C.M.A.1986).

Charge I and its specification alleged the offense of dereliction of duty in violation of Article 92, U.C.M.J. Pursuant to M.C.M. 1969 (Rev.Ed.), paragraph 127, Section A, Table of Maximum Punishments, the maximum imposable punishment for that offense was confinement at hard labor for three months and forfeiture of two-thirds pay per month not to exceed three months. The maximum imposable punishment for the remaining offenses of which the appellant is guilty is, pursuant to the Table of Maximum Punishments, a dishonorable dis[690]*690charge, confinement at hard labor for 21 years, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances. After considering all the matters presented to the court-martial in aggravation, extenuation, mitigation, the relatively minor nature of the offense set aside and dismissed, and the seriousness of the offenses the appellant remains convicted, we reassess the sentence and find the sentence as approved by the convening authority to be, nonetheless, appropriate.

Accordingly, the sentence to a dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for seven years, forfeiture of $450.00 per month for three months, and reduction to the grade of sergeant is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Heyward
17 M.J. 942 (U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1984)
United States v. Heyward
22 M.J. 35 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 M.J. 689, 1986 CMR LEXIS 2547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-heyward-usafctmilrev-1986.