United States v. Herrera-Trejo

234 F. App'x 218
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 2, 2007
Docket05-40819
StatusUnpublished

This text of 234 F. App'x 218 (United States v. Herrera-Trejo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Herrera-Trejo, 234 F. App'x 218 (5th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM: *

Mr. Herrera-Trejo pleaded guilty to the charge of attempted illegal re-entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 and was sentenced to 27 months of imprisonment, followed by three years of supervised relief. We previously affirmed the judgment. United States v. Herrera-Trejo, 169 Fed. Appx. 225, 226 (5th Cir.2006). The Supreme Court has vacated and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of Lopez v. Gonzales, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 625, 166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006). Gutierrez-Tovar et al. v. United States, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 828, 166 L.Ed.2d 662 (2006). Following the Supreme Court’s remand, we requested and received supplemental letter briefs from both parties regarding the impact of Lopez.

Mr. Herrera has since completed his term of imprisonment; immigration authorities placed a detainer on him and his counsel concedes his probable removal. His appeal is therefore moot, according to binding circuit precedent. United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 383 *219 (5th Cir.2007) (“Because the defendant has been deported ... and is legally unable, without permission of the Attorney General, to reenter the United States to be present for a resentencing proceeding as required by Rule 43, there is no relief we are able to grant him and his appeal is moot.”). We therefore DISMISS the appeal as to the judgment of sentence. We AFFIRM the judgment of conviction; Mr. Herrera’s arguments in that regard remain foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998).

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis
483 F.3d 381 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
Almendarez-Torres v. United States
523 U.S. 224 (Supreme Court, 1998)
Lopez v. Gonzales
549 U.S. 47 (Supreme Court, 2006)
GALINDO-PENA v. Gonzales
549 U.S. 1093 (Supreme Court, 2006)
United States v. Herrera-Trejo
169 F. App'x 225 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 F. App'x 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-herrera-trejo-ca5-2007.