United States v. Herrera
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-50151 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
NOE HERRERA,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-92-CR-239-3 - - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Noe Herrera appeals his resentencing pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2). The district court did not err in not reducing his
fine. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); U.S.S.G., Appendix C amd. 505;
United States v. Segler, 37 F.3d 1131, 1135 (5th Cir. 1994).
Herrera did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel for
failing to argue for a reduction in the fine. See Koch v.
Puckett, 907 F.2d 524, 527 (5th Cir. 1990).
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. - 2 -
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Herrera (United States v. Herrera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.