United States v. Hernandez

297 F. App'x 360
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hernandez. Read the opinion of the Court — 457 F.3d 416
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2008·No. 07-50416·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Alberto Rodriguez Hernandez (Rodriguez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Rodriguez has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Rodriguez’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for *361 leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Rodriguez’s motion for the appointment of new counsel and his motion for an order that current counsel proceed with the appeal are DENIED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5ti-i Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hernandez, 297 F. App'x 360 (5th Cir. 2008).

297 F. App'x 360 (United States v. Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)