United States v. Hernandez
This text of 133 F. App'x 149 (United States v. Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ulisses Hernandez appeals his sentence following a guilty-plea for credit card fraud. Hernandez challenges the district court’s denial of a reduction for acceptance of responsibility. The district court’s finding that Hernandez failed to admit all relevant conduct for which he is accountable is supported by information in the PSR. This finding forms a sufficient and independent basis to support the trial court’s denial of credit for acceptance of responsibility. No error has been shown. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 F. App'x 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hernandez-ca5-2005.