United States v. Hernandez
This text of 496 F. App'x 310 (United States v. Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Alejandro DeJesus Hernandez has filed a notice of appeal. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). In his notice of appeal, Hernandez does not reference the order from which he is appealing. A review of the district court’s docket sheet does not show any final order from which Hernandez could take an appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We also deny as moot the motion to dispense with the appendix. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
496 F. App'x 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hernandez-ca4-2012.