United States v. Heriberto Pacheco-Ruiz
This text of 549 F.2d 1204 (United States v. Heriberto Pacheco-Ruiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
After considering appellee’s petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc (filed December 10, 1975) and appellant’s objection thereto (filed February 17, 1976), Judges Hufstedler and Goodwin voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc; Judge Carter voted to allow the petition for rehearing and recommended that the case be heard en banc.
The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge of the court requested en banc consideration, and a majority of the active judges of the court voted to take the case en banc unless the panel modified its opinion. The panel modified its opinion and circulated it to the entire court; thereafter, upon a vote of the active judges, the request for en banc failed of a majority.
The opinion filed October 23,1975, is withdrawn. The attached amended opinion is filed herewith, together with Judge Carter’s dissenting opinion.
See Appendix.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
549 F.2d 1204, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 5719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-heriberto-pacheco-ruiz-ca9-1976.