United States v. Henryes
This text of 18 C.M.A. 579 (United States v. Henryes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
Pursuant to . his plea of guilty, the accused stands, convicted of wrongful attempts involving the possession, sale, and transfer of marihuana, in violation of Article 80, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 880. The' law officer’s inquiry into the providence of the guilty plea is not unlike that found in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247. Because the accused, in mitigation, freely admitted the acts here charged, we are satisfied that his plea is provident. The procedure followed in this ease, however, does not meet the standard that múst apply to cases tried thirty days after the decision in United States v Care, supra.
The decision of the board of review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 C.M.A. 579, 18 USCMA 579, 40 C.M.R. 291, 1969 CMA LEXIS 704, 1969 WL 6080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-henryes-cma-1969.