United States v. Henry

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Henry. Read the opinion of the Court — 673 F.3d 285
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 31, 2011·No. 11-6053·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6053

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALTON R. HENRY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:00-cr-00150-RBS-2)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alton R. Henry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Alton R. Henry appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion seeking a reduction in his

sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Henry, No. 2:00-cr-00150-RBS-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Henry, (4th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Henry (United States v. Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related