United States v. Henriques

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7184

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PHILLIP HENRIQUES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:93-cr-00089-MR-2)

Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 17, 2009

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Henriques, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Phillip Henriques appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c) (2006) based on Amendment 591. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Henriques, No. 3:93-cr-00089-MR-2 (W.D.N.C. June 5, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED