United States v. Helm
This text of United States v. Helm (United States v. Helm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 1 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2845 D.C. No. 1:15-cr-00057-SPW-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. MEMORANDUM*
JOSHUA LEE HELM,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2024**
Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Joshua Lee Helm appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion
for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We dismiss the
appeal as untimely.
Helm filed his notice of appeal more than 44 days after entry of the district
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1), (b)(4). Because the government
properly objected to Helm’s untimely notice of appeal, we must dismiss. See
United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 941-42 (9th Cir. 2007).
DISMISSED.
2 23-2845
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Helm, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-helm-ca9-2024.