United States v. Heledoro-Rivera
This text of United States v. Heledoro-Rivera (United States v. Heledoro-Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 94-50264 Summary Calendar _____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
JAIME HELEDORO-RIVERA,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (USDC No. DR-94-CR-18) _________________________________________________________________ November 28, 1995 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant's pro se
motion entitled "Modification of Sentence Under 18 U.S.C. §
3582(b)(2)", which the district court apparently treated as a
motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Appellant argues that his guilty
plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered, and that his
counsel was ineffective. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's
dismissal of the motion.
AFFIRMED.
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Heledoro-Rivera, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-heledoro-rivera-ca5-1995.