United States v. Hazel

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6376

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BOBBY HAZEL,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-6377

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BOBBY HAZEL,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-6378

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. BOBBY HAZEL,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-6379

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BOBBY HAZEL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:93-cr-00062-JCC-1; 1:97-cv-00633-AVB)

Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 24, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby Hazel, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Bobby Hazel appeals

district court orders denying his motion for appointment of

counsel and for DNA testing under 18 U.S.C. § 3600 (2006), and

denying his motions for clarification and for reconsideration.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and

affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United

States v. Hazel, Nos. 1:93-cr-00062-JCC-1; 1:97-cv-00633-AVB

(E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2011; Feb. 2, 2011; Feb. 4, 2011; Feb. 24,

2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED