United States v. Hazel

430 F. App'x 241
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 24, 2011·No. Nos. 11-6876, 11-6377, 11-6378, 11-6379·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Bobby Hazel appeals district court orders denying his motion for appointment of counsel and for DNA testing under 18 U.S.C. § 3600 (2006), and denying his motions for clarification and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United States v. Hazel, Nos. l:93-cr-00062-JCC-1; 1:97-cv-00633-AVB (E.D.Va. Jan. 10, 2011; Feb. 2, 2011; Feb. 4, 2011; Feb. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hazel, 430 F. App'x 241 (4th Cir. 2011).

430 F. App'x 241 (United States v. Hazel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DNA testing
18 U.S.C. § 3600