United States v. Hazel

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 24, 2011
Docket11-6376
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Hazel (United States v. Hazel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hazel, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6376

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BOBBY HAZEL,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-6377

No. 11-6378

v. BOBBY HAZEL,

No. 11-6379

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:93-cr-00062-JCC-1; 1:97-cv-00633-AVB)

Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 24, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby Hazel, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Bobby Hazel appeals

district court orders denying his motion for appointment of

counsel and for DNA testing under 18 U.S.C. § 3600 (2006), and

denying his motions for clarification and for reconsideration.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and

affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United

States v. Hazel, Nos. 1:93-cr-00062-JCC-1; 1:97-cv-00633-AVB

(E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2011; Feb. 2, 2011; Feb. 4, 2011; Feb. 24,

2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DNA testing
18 U.S.C. § 3600

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Hazel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hazel-ca4-2011.