United States v. Haynesworth

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 24, 2009
• Docket: 09-6034
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6034

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY HAYNESWORTH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:99-cr-00286-CMC-1)

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 24, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Haynesworth, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anthony Haynesworth appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Haynesworth, No. 3:99-cr-00268-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 22,

2008), and the reasons expressed in our recent decision in

United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 253-56 (4th Cir. 2008).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED