United States v. Haynes

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 2, 2026·No. 25-11089·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 25-11089 Document: 70-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/02/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 25-11089 June 2, 2026 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Morris Burrell Haynes,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:22-CR-326-2 ______________________________

Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Morris Burrell Haynes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Haynes has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-11089 Document: 70-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/02/2026

No. 25-11089

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Haynes, (5th Cir. 2026).

United States v. Haynes (United States v. Haynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)