United States v. Haynes

Opinion

Case: 25-11093 Document: 58-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/19/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 25-11093 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ May 19, 2026 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Durrell Kevon Haynes,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:22-CR-326-1 ______________________________

Before Richman, Southwick, and Willett, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Durrell Kevon Haynes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Haynes has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Haynes’s claims of

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-11093 Document: 58-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/19/2026

No. 25-11093

ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Haynes’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.