United States v. Haynes

339 F. App'x 353
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Haynes. Read the opinion of the Court — 354 F. App'x 763
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 5, 2009·No. No. 09-6395·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Larry Lee Haynes appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Haynes relies on Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines as the basis for his motion. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual, App. C. Amend. 706. The district court lowered Haynes’ sentence from 360 months to 292 months of imprisonment, the bottom of his recalculated sentencing range under the Amendment. Nonetheless, Haynes ap[354]*354peals. To the extent Haynes seeks a sentence below his amended Guidelines range, we deny relief based on our recent decision in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Haynes, 339 F. App'x 353 (4th Cir. 2009).

339 F. App'x 353 (United States v. Haynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dunphy
551 F.3d 247 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)