United States v. Hatcher

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hatcher. Read the opinion of the Court — 560 F.3d 222
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 5, 2006·No. 05-7683·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7683

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GREG HATCHER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-05-494-5)

Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 5, 2006

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Greg Hatcher, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Greg Hatcher, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)

petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

United States v. Hatcher, No. CA-05-494-5 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 2005).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hatcher, (4th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Hatcher (United States v. Hatcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241