United States v. Hatcher

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Hatcher

198 F. App'x 309

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hatcher. Read the opinion of the Court — 560 F.3d 222 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 5, 2006·No. No. 05-7683·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Greg Hatcher, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) peti[310]*310tion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hatcher, No. CA-05-494-5 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Greg Hatcher, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) peti[310]*310tion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hatcher, No. CA-05-494-5 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Hatcher, 198 F. App'x 309 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

198 F. App'x 309 (United States v. Hatcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related