United States v. Harry Patrick McCarthy

184 F.2d 668
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedOctober 18, 1950
Docket4096
StatusPublished

This text of 184 F.2d 668 (United States v. Harry Patrick McCarthy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Harry Patrick McCarthy, 184 F.2d 668 (10th Cir. 1950).

Opinion

PICKETT, Circuit Judge. • ■

An information was filed against the appellee in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma charging him with the crime of unlawfully importing and transporting intoxicating liquor from the states of Missouri and Kansas into the State of Oklahoma in violation of the Federal Liquor Enforcement Act of 1936, as amended, Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 1262. The trial court sustained a motion to dismiss the information upon the grounds that the Oklahoma statutes were not sufficient to make effective the aforesaid Act. This appeal followed.

The identical question was today decided by this court in the case of United States v. Bill Rome Williams and Ben Elmer Shaw, 10 Cir., 184 F.2d 663. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case, judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Williams
184 F.2d 663 (Tenth Circuit, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 F.2d 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harry-patrick-mccarthy-ca10-1950.