FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 59

Transportation into State prohibiting sale

18 U.S.C. § 1262
Title18Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter59 — LIQUOR TRAFFIC

This text of 18 U.S.C. § 1262 (Transportation into State prohibiting sale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 1262.

Text

Whoever imports, brings, or transports any intoxicating liquor into any State, Territory, District, or Possession in which all sales, except for scientific, sacramental, medicinal, or mechanical purposes, of intoxicating liquor containing more than 4 per centum of alcohol by volume or 3.2 per centum of alcohol by weight are prohibited, otherwise than in the course of continuous interstate transportation through such State, Territory, District, or Possession or attempts so to do, or assists in so doing, Shall (1) If such liquor is not accompanied by such permits, or licenses therefor as may be required by the laws of such State, Territory, District, or Possession or (2) if all importation, bringing, or transportation of intoxicating liquor into such State, Territory, District, or Possession

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manfred Daut v. United States
405 F.2d 312 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)
45 case citations
Jones v. United States
251 F.2d 288 (Tenth Circuit, 1958)
43 case citations
Earl Elmer Gravatt v. United States
260 F.2d 498 (Tenth Circuit, 1958)
28 case citations
City of Tulsa v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension
1963 OK 267 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1963)
19 case citations
United States v. John M. Winters, Jr., and Marian M. Winters
261 F.2d 675 (Tenth Circuit, 1958)
16 case citations
Ritter v. United States
230 F.2d 324 (Tenth Circuit, 1956)
12 case citations
Milton Eldo Smith v. United States
264 F.2d 469 (Eighth Circuit, 1959)
8 case citations
Harry Patrick McCarthy v. United States
264 F.2d 473 (Eighth Circuit, 1959)
8 case citations
City Nat. Bank, Lawton, Okl. v. United States
207 F.2d 741 (Tenth Circuit, 1953)
8 case citations
Byford v. State
1949 OK CR 128 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1949)
8 case citations
Russell G. Cofer v. United States
256 F.2d 221 (Eighth Circuit, 1958)
7 case citations
Florida Department of Business Regulation v. Zachy's Wine & Liquor, Inc.
125 F.3d 1399 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
7 case citations
State Ex Rel. Livingston v. Maxwell
1960 OK 122 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1960)
6 case citations
United States v. Williams
184 F.2d 663 (Tenth Circuit, 1950)
3 case citations
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. United States
201 F.2d 732 (Tenth Circuit, 1953)
3 case citations
United States v. One 1951 Cadillac Sedan
107 F. Supp. 491 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1952)
3 case citations
United States v. One 1956 Dodge Coronet 2-Door Sedan
150 F. Supp. 503 (W.D. Arkansas, 1957)
1 case citations
Stevenson v. United States
200 F.2d 109 (Tenth Circuit, 1952)
1 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 761; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §32, 63 Stat. 94; Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, §3540, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4925; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes

1948 Act
Based on sections 222, 223 of title 27, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Intoxicating Liquors (June 25, 1936, ch. 815, §§2, 3, 49 Stat. 1928).
Section consolidates subsection (a) of section 222 with section 223, of title 27, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
Words "or 3.2 per centum of alcohol by weight" were inserted after "volume." Such words conform with Flippin v. U.S. (1941, 121 F. 2d 742, 744, certiorari denied, 62 S. Ct. 184, 314 U.S. 677, 86 L. Ed. 542); Robason v. U.S. (1941, 122 F. 2d 991); Dolloff v. U.S. (1941, 121 F. 2d 157, certiorari denied, 62 S. Ct. 108, 314 U.S. 626, 86 L. Ed. 503, rehearing denied, 62 S. Ct. 178, 314 U.S. 710, 86 L. Ed. 566); and Tucker v. U.S. (1941, 123 F. 2d 280).
Those cases overruled Arnold v. U.S. (1940, 115 F. 2d 523) and Gregg v. U.S. (1940, 116 F. 2d 609) and established that preservation of the congressional intent which requires addition of the inserted language.
Subsection (b) of section 223 of title 27, U.S.C., 1940 ed., has been reworded to apply the definition of intoxicating liquor contained in the laws of the respective States to this section only, in accordance with administrative interpretation. Said section 223 was derived from section 3 of the Liquor Enforcement Act of 1936 (Act June 25, 1936, ch. 815, 49 Stat. 1928), which was enacted for the protection of dry States. As originally enacted, its provisions relating to such definition also embraced the interstate commerce liquor laws from which sections 1263–1265 of this title were derived. In the enforcement of the latter, however, their own definitions have been applied and not the definitions of the States into which or through which the liquor was shipped.
Words "Territory, District, or Possession" were inserted after "State", to conform with the definition of "State" given in said section 222 of title 27, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Such section, including subsection (b) thereof, is also incorporated in section 3615 of this title.
Words "be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall" were omitted in view of definitive section 1 of this title.
Minor changes were made throughout in arrangement and phraseology.

1949 Act
This section [section 32] corrects a typographical error in section 1262 of title 18, U.S.C.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000" in second par.
1990—Pub. L. 101–647 substituted "State" for "state" in section catchline.
1949—Act May 24, 1949, substituted "Districts" for "District" in last par.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 1262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/1262.