United States v. Harry L. Davis

452 F.2d 577, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6440
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 1971
Docket71-2564
StatusPublished
Cited by29 cases

This text of 452 F.2d 577 (United States v. Harry L. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Harry L. Davis, 452 F.2d 577, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6440 (9th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In December, 1968, appellant and another were indicted in one count for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) [bank robbery] and in another count for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d) [bank robbery by use of a dangerous weapon]. On December 23, 1968, after consultation with appointed counsel, appellant entered a plea of guilty to count one of the indictment. On January 20, 1969, he was sentenced. At the same time, count two of the indictment was dismissed on the government’s motion.

A previous 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion was denied by the district court and by this court. Davis v. United States, 441 F.2d 658 (9th Cir. 1971).

The sole issue presented to the district court on the present 2255 motion is whether the government, upon the plea of guilty, was required to prove that the deposits of the bank were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as alleged in the indictment. Appellant does not assert that his guilty plea was involuntary, nor that it was made with a misunderstanding of the nature of the charge or the consequences of the plea. For that matter, he might well be precluded from making such contentions. Davis v. United States, supra. In these circumstances, a plea of guilty admits all averments of fact in the indictment, all defects not jurisdictional are cured, all defenses are waived and the prosecution is relieved from the duty of proving any facts. The effect is the same as if appellant had been tried before a jury and had been found guilty on evidence covering all of the material facts. Grimes v. United States, 396 F.2d 331, 334 (9th Cir. 1968); Robison v. United States, 329 F.2d 156 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 859, 85 S.Ct. 115, 13 L.Ed.2d 61 (1964); Smith v. United States, 287 F.2d 270, 273 (9th Cir. 1961); cert. denied 366 U.S. 946, 81 S.Ct. 1676, 6 L.Ed.2d 856 (1961), and Berg v. United States, 176 F.2d 122 (9th Cir. 1949), cert. denied 338 U.S. 876, 70 S.Ct. 137, 94 L.Ed. 537 (1949). Other contentions made by appellant were not presented to the lower court and are not properly before us. In any event, they are clearly without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marshall v. Goguen
D. Montana, 2022
United States v. Jaime Price
589 F. App'x 350 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
Young v. Holder
697 F.3d 976 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Louchart
680 F.3d 635 (Sixth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Aguila-Montes De Oca
655 F.3d 915 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Charles Thomas
355 F.3d 1191 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Mc Neal
72 F. App'x 691 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Diaz
52 F. App'x 810 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Cazares
121 F.3d 1241 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Jeffrey Anthony Whipple
110 F.3d 72 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Adam Travis Cullins
66 F.3d 336 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Guy Hubert Hall v. United States
60 F.3d 833 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Nicholas A. Johnson
50 F.3d 17 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. David Lee Dahlheim
29 F.3d 635 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
David Michael Rodrigues v. United States
5 F.3d 539 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Roger Dale Toles
967 F.2d 595 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
John Joseph Gallimore, v United States of America
891 F.2d 294 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
Darrell Allen Burch v. United States
875 F.2d 862 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
452 F.2d 577, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harry-l-davis-ca9-1971.