Harry L. Davis, and v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Harry L. Davis, and v. United States

441 F.2d 658, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10231

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 12, 1971·No. 26111·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The order denying without a hearing the motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is affirmed. See Sims v. United States, 272 F.Supp. 577, affd. (4th Cir.) 382 F.2d 294, cert. denied 390 U.S. 961, 88 S.Ct. 1062, 19 L.Ed.2d 1158. Cf. Brady v. United States (1970) 397 U.S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747. Cf. Hinds v. United States (9th Cir. 1970), 429 F.2d 1322.

The defendant was carefully and fairly treated at the time he entered his guilty plea to one count of bank robbery.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The order denying without a hearing the motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is affirmed. See Sims v. United States, 272 F.Supp. 577, affd. (4th Cir.) 382 F.2d 294, cert. denied 390 U.S. 961, 88 S.Ct. 1062, 19 L.Ed.2d 1158. Cf. Brady v. United States (1970) 397 U.S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747. Cf. Hinds v. United States (9th Cir. 1970), 429 F.2d 1322.

The defendant was carefully and fairly treated at the time he entered his guilty plea to one count of bank robbery.

Harry L. Davis, and v. United States, 441 F.2d 658, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10231 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

441 F.2d 658 (Harry L. Davis, and v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related