Harry L. Davis, and v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Harry L. Davis, and v. United States

441 F.2d 658, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10231

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 12, 1971

Docket26111

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 441 F.2d 658 (Harry L. Davis, and v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harry L. Davis, and v. United States, 441 F.2d 658, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10231 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The order denying without a hearing the motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is affirmed. See Sims v. United States, 272 F.Supp. 577, affd. (4th Cir.) 382 F.2d 294, cert. denied 390 U.S. 961, 88 S.Ct. 1062, 19 L.Ed.2d 1158. Cf. Brady v. United States (1970) 397 U.S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747. Cf. Hinds v. United States (9th Cir. 1970), 429 F.2d 1322.

The defendant was carefully and fairly treated at the time he entered his guilty plea to one count of bank robbery.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The order denying without a hearing the motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is affirmed. See Sims v. United States, 272 F.Supp. 577, affd. (4th Cir.) 382 F.2d 294, cert. denied 390 U.S. 961, 88 S.Ct. 1062, 19 L.Ed.2d 1158. Cf. Brady v. United States (1970) 397 U.S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747. Cf. Hinds v. United States (9th Cir. 1970), 429 F.2d 1322.

The defendant was carefully and fairly treated at the time he entered his guilty plea to one count of bank robbery.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

441 F.2d 658, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harry-l-davis-and-v-united-states-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack