United States v. Harrison

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6254

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DARROL J. HARRISON, a/k/a Big D,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (2:92-cr-00446-DCN-1)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrol J. Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Thomas Phillips, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Darrol J. Harrison appeals from the district court’s

order granting in part his motion for reduction of sentence

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), but denying his motion

to the extent that Harrison sought a resentencing. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Harrison, No. 2:92-cr-00446-DCN-1 (D.S.C. Jan. 27,

2009); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.

2009). We deny Harrison’s motions for appointment of counsel

and for an extension of time and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED