United States v. Harris

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 84 F.4th 596
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 2, 2021·No. 21-10450·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 21-10450 Document: 00516115635 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/02/2021

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED December 2, 2021 No. 21-10450 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Robert Harris, Jr.,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 4:20-CR-339-17

Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Robert Harris, Jr., has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Harris has not filed a response.

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opin- ion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-10450 Document: 00516115635 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/02/2021

No. 21-10450

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo- lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harris, (5th Cir. 2021).

United States v. Harris (United States v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)