United States v. Harris

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 5, 2024·No. 23-10890·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 23-10890 Document: 48-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/05/2024

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 23-10890 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ April 5, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce

United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Michael Dywayne Harris,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20-CR-32-5

Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Michael Harris has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Harris has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief, relevant portions of the record, and Harris’s response.

*

This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 23-10890 Document: 48-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/05/2024

No. 23-10890

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harris, (5th Cir. 2024).

United States v. Harris (United States v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)