United States v. Harris
This text of United States v. Harris (United States v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 23-10890 Document: 48-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/05/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-10890 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ April 5, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Michael Dywayne Harris,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20-CR-32-5 ______________________________
Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Michael Harris has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Harris has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief, relevant portions of the record, and Harris’s response.
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-10890 Document: 48-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/05/2024
No. 23-10890
We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non- frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Harris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harris-ca5-2024.