United States v. Harris
This text of 699 F. App'x 211 (United States v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Kedrick Jamel Harris appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Harris, No. 1:12-cr-00024-JPJ-RSB-7 (W.D. Va. June 27, 2017). We further deny Harris’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court arid argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
699 F. App'x 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harris-ca4-2017.