United States v. Harris

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Harris

699 F. App'x 211

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2017·No. No. 17-6863·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kedrick Jamel Harris appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Harris, No. 1:12-cr-00024-JPJ-RSB-7 (W.D. Va. June 27, 2017). We further deny Harris’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court arid argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kedrick Jamel Harris appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Harris, No. 1:12-cr-00024-JPJ-RSB-7 (W.D. Va. June 27, 2017). We further deny Harris’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court arid argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Harris, 699 F. App'x 211 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

699 F. App'x 211 (United States v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related