United States v. Harris

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 6, 2009
• Docket: 08-8051
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8051

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DENNIS HARRIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:92-cr-00113-1)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 6, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dennis Harris appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and reconsideration of that

order. We have reviewed the record and find the district court

did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions. See United

States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion

under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the district

court”); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir.

2000). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders for

the reasons stated therein. See United States v. Harris, No.

2:92-cr-00113-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 7, 2008, entered July 10,

2008; filed Aug. 27, 2008, entered Aug. 28, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED