United States v. Harris

299 F. App'x 303
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 13, 2008·No. No. 08-6941·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Belton Harris, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny the motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harris, 299 F. App'x 303 (4th Cir. 2008).

299 F. App'x 303 (United States v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related