United States v. Harris

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 109 F. App'x 518
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 1, 2007·No. 06-7983·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7983

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DONTE ROLANDO HARRIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:03-cr-00056-nkm)

Submitted: January 25, 2007 Decided: February 1, 2007

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donte Rolando Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donte Rolando Harris appeals the district court’s order

denying the motion to withdraw his guilty plea filed two years

after he was sentenced. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Harris, No. 3:03-cr-00056-nkm

(W.D. Va. Nov. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harris, (4th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Harris (United States v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.